In the Weekly World News category this week, we have the logical followup to Saddam's capture:
Hot off the presses at the WeeklyWorld News:
I'm not saying they're 100% correct here, but... it would explain much, would it not? I mean, the US ain't lookin' for these babies, are they? They're looking for chemical and biological weapons, and maybe the odd nuclear warhead. These babies would be a) harder to hide and b) harder and more expensive to feed.. so, of course the US missed them!
And some people call the Weekly World News a rag...
From the front page of the current issue of the Weekly World News:
[note: photo was not in Wayback Machine's archives. will try to track it down and include it.]
Have a peek in the checkout line at your local grocery store...
Why, it can't be! The WWW is recycling images to use for their cover stories? I'm shocked, shocked to find that the June 22, 2003 image is naught but a cropped reverse version of this one!
Goodness, you don't suppose... that it's remotely possible that... the WWW cannot be counted upon as a reliable new source?
Does that mean that Bat Boy isn't real too? Augh! My perception of reality is shattered!
Posted by CanDragon at March 7, 2004 01:32 PM